First sustained empirical view of bankruptcy case reopenings under § 350(b). 5,138 reopened cases analyzed across all chapters, 1992-2026. Most prior literature on reopening works from individual case studies; this dataset enables base-rate analysis.
| Chapter | Reopened | Total in chapter | Reopening rate | Post-discharge | Post-dismissal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ch. 7 | 2,871 | 104,235 | 2.75% | 93% (2,668) | 2% (55) |
| Ch. 11 | 272 | 5,739 | 4.74% | 44% (120) | 14% (39) |
| Ch. 13 | 1,877 | 103,204 | 1.82% | 58% (1,081) | 33% (626) |
| Ch. AP | 115 | 5,577 | 2.06% | 0% (0) | 24% (28) |
The 93% post-discharge rate for Ch.7 reopenings reflects the chapter's characteristic procedural categories:
The single largest category of reopenings. The debtor or counsel discovers a creditor that was inadvertently left off Schedule E/F. Adding the creditor post-discharge ensures the discharge applies to that debt. Filing fee is reduced for omitted-creditor reopenings.
Trustee or third party discovers an asset (lawsuit recovery, inheritance, hidden asset) that should have been administered. Trustee files motion to reopen and administer the asset. Distribution to creditors follows.
Debtor seeks contempt sanctions against a creditor who continues collection on a discharged debt. The bankruptcy court has exclusive jurisdiction over § 524 violations; reopening is the procedural vehicle.
Trustee, U.S. Trustee, or creditor files for revocation of discharge under § 727(d) on grounds of fraud, refusal to obey court orders, or failure to satisfy other conditions. The §727(d) cases documented in the rare outcomes dataset all start as reopenings.
If a debtor wants to reaffirm a secured debt but the case has closed, reopening is required to file the reaffirmation agreement and obtain court approval (for pro se debtors) or trustee acknowledgment (for represented debtors).
Ch.13 reopening patterns split between post-discharge (58%) and post-dismissal (33%):
Chapter 11's 4.74% reopening rate is highest among all chapters. Drivers:
| Year | Reopenings |
|---|---|
| 2013 | 333 |
| 2014 | 303 |
| 2015 | 298 |
| 2016 | 292 |
| 2017 | 258 |
| 2018 | 300 |
| 2019 | 282 |
| 2020 | 207 |
| 2021 | 170 |
| 2022 | 139 |
| 2023 | 125 |
| 2024 | 112 |
| 2025 | 136 |
The 2020+ decline parallels the broader bankruptcy-volume decline: fewer cases means fewer post-discharge events triggering reopenings. Plus pandemic-era court schedules and remote proceedings produced procedural friction that delayed reopening filings.
| District | Reopenings | Total cases | Reopening rate |
|---|---|---|---|
| mowbk | 1,725 | 42,263 | 4.08% |
| flsbk | 1,513 | 43,932 | 3.44% |
| ksbk | 700 | 41,650 | 1.68% |
| txsbk | 376 | 30,412 | 1.24% |
| flmbk | 123 | 5,699 | 2.16% |
| mabk | 71 | 1,441 | 4.93% |
| nvbk | 36 | 327 | 11.01% |
Top districts vary from 1.2% (Texas Southern) to 4-5% (Western Missouri, Massachusetts). Variation reflects local clerk-office practice in setting reopening fees, the local bar's tendency to file omitted-creditor motions, and per-district trustee activity post-discharge.
Open Bankruptcy Project (2026). Bankruptcy Reopening Patterns Dataset, v0.1. 501(c)(3) public charity (EIN 41-5159631). URL: https://viz.openbankruptcyproject.org/reopening/ License: CC BY 4.0